E-Mail
Print
The plan has been discussed as part of negotiations between the White House and Congress to avoid going over the "Fiscal Cliff".
“Granting any president the sole power over the federal debt limit is clearly not what the Founding Fathers envisioned
when they drafted the Constitution. This proposal is an unnecessary distraction from reaching bipartisan solutions to the immediate budget and deficit problems the nation faces today,” Cochran said.
“The President’s request for permanent authority to raise the debt ceiling is a non-starter in Congress,” said Wicker. “A solution to avoid the fiscal cliff will require cooperation from both sides. With 21 days until the end of the year, now is the time to work together rather than spending time posturing.”
The following is text from the Cochran-Wicker news release:
The letter to Obama cites the use of the debt limit by Congresses in the past to craft deficit-reduction agreements since the mid-1980s. The letter also links the debt limit authority to the constitutional “power of the purse” granted to Congress.
The letter states that nearly every significant deficit reduction law of the past 27 years has been linked to a debt limit debate: “For Congress to surrender its control over the debt limit would be to permanently surrender what has long provided the best opportunity to enact bipartisan deficit reduction legislation.”
It goes on to say: “We also believe that Congress’ power over borrowing, like the power of the purse, is firmly rooted in our constitutional tradition. The Founders understood the potential danger of permitting the Executive to unilaterally incur new public debt. Consequently, Article I of the Constitution empowers only Congress ‘to borrow money on the credit of the United States.’ The debt ceiling is the means by which Congress exercises this inherent legislative responsibility.”
